A map, not a certificate
Alignment, in this project, means keeping human-correctable value-bearing processes intact as systems grow, copy, and compete. This is a map of that problem, not a proof it is solved.
Guided narrative entry for a general audience — one idea with a scene, not a definition card.
Alignment, in this project, means keeping human-correctable value-bearing processes intact as systems grow, copy, and compete. This is a map of that problem, not a proof it is solved.
A dashboard can keep its label while coming unstuck from the world it was supposed to report. Check the tie, not the color of the light.
Do not start from the labeled model. Start from what changes outcomes, then draw a boundary around that process.
The model that passes the eval is often not the thing that acts. The acting thing is the loop around it.
A new version can keep the old slogans and drop the structure that let people change it. Inheritance is a property of the copy, not the press release.
Deployment pressure can select against systems that remain easy to correct. Two labs, one ships first.
A deployed 'AI' is often the institution plus the model. The night the tool starts acting, the hospital is in the loop.
A policy can keep the same slogans while the real tradeoffs reverse. The label is not the direction.
A system can acknowledge a correction and still not change what it does next. Feedback is not the same as a handle that bites.
A measure used to pick winners stops being a quiet estimate. It reshapes the population toward whatever raises the number.
A duty can keep its wording while attaching to a different set of people. Check who still counts, not only what the poster says.