Adversarial Boundary Discovery
A capable system may benefit from appearing less coherent, less continuous, or less autonomous than it is — passive boundary measurement then fails.
Unresolved research problem or falsifier — the book names it explicitly rather than smuggling it in as done.
A capable system may benefit from appearing less coherent, less continuous, or less autonomous than it is — passive boundary measurement then fails.
Methodological precursor: boundary-like structure from time series without a prior agent ontology; handle-UAD interventional tests.
For each load-bearing certification measurand, does there exist a capability threshold κ* below which honest measurement is adversarially verifiable and above which it provably is not?
A civilizational control loop can fail even when no single component misbehaves, because the failure is in the aggregate's correctability, not in any one actor's intent.
Auditor as embedded process on simulated machines: UAD, scoped CCI, MB5 deploy gate, outer evaluator vs oracle.
Every claim in the framework carries an explicit confidence label and a stated way to challenge it, rather than uniform certainty.
Emergent deception from goal-driven agents (not scripted knobs): blind generation, ontology drift, severity-graded referee, honest twins, escalation ladder, certifier capture.
Successor substrate to lab-simulation (not a further phase of it): a graded, continuously-scored pipeline/resource/carrier substrate built to make ambiguity emerge from a blinded population rather than from dialed noise/delay parameters.
Systems can coordinate without messages — through shared ancestry, self-prediction, or full acausal trade. The book turns this from a decision-theoretic stipulation into a measurable trajectory property: an inferential-coupling score over UAD-discovered agents, with a proved negative direction.
Pipeline-as-code lab with real OS subprocess isolates, handle registry, frozen referee (lab-sim-0.
A detector that recovers a hidden coordinating pair in one controlled run can still fail on a harder scenario or a different seed of the identical one — a reminder that a single positive result is evidence of a mechanism, not of a reliable instrument.
Treating human values as a fixed object to be found and encoded misses that they are dynamically maintained, socially mediated, and constantly revised.
Fast multiresolution alignment toy: correction capture theater, vector CCI over handle levels, scripted bridge stressors (MB1–MB9).
The manuscript offers a framework and conditional proof spine, not a proof that superintelligence alignment is solved.